MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Statistics and Computing
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

102 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
102 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 3

Labels cover 0 of 102 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 102 of 102 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundno abstractunlabeled
Annealed importance sampling
Radford M. Neal
2001· article· en· Statistics and Computing· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1,225
citations
affunlabeled
On optimal multiple changepoint algorithms for large data
Robert Maidstone, Toby Dylan Hocking, Guillem Rigaill, Paul Fearnhead
2016· article· en· Statistics and Computing· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
191
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Split Hamiltonian Monte Carlo
Babak Shahbaba, Shiwei Lan, Wesley O. Johnson, Radford M. Neal
2013· article· en· Statistics and Computing· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
69
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Supervised functional principal component analysis
Yunlong Nie, Liangliang Wang, Baisen Liu, Jiguo Cao
2017· article· en· Statistics and Computing· Chemistry
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
39
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Estimating mixed-effects differential equation models
L. Wang, Jiguo Cao, J. O. Ramsay, David M. Burger, Catherine Laporte, Jürgen K. Rockstroh
2012· article· en· Statistics and Computing· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
28
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Quasi-random numbers for copula models
Mathieu Cambou, Marius Hofert, Christiane Lemieux
2016· article· en· Statistics and Computing· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
20
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Robust model-based sampling designs
A. H. Welsh, Douglas P. Wiens
2012· article· en· Statistics and Computing· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
19
citations
affunlabeled
Weight-preserving simulated tempering
Nicholas G. Tawn, Gareth O. Roberts, Jeffrey S. Rosenthal
2019· article· en· Statistics and Computing· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
17
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Efficient use of exact samples
Duncan J. Murdoch, Jeffrey S. Rosenthal
2000· article· en· Statistics and Computing· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
16
citations
fundno affno abstractunlabeled
Automatic polynomial wavelet regression
Thomas C. M. Lee, Hee‐Seok Oh
2004· article· en· Statistics and Computing· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
12
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Mean likelihood estimators
A. Ian McLeod, Benoît Quenneville
2001· article· en· Statistics and Computing· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Mixture models: building a parameter space
Vahed Maroufy, Paul Marriott
2016· article· en· Statistics and Computing· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
next →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About