MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2904110954 · doi:10.1037/cpp0000260

Expanding Pediatric Psychology: Perspectives of International Trainees

2018· article· en· W2904110954 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tetsuo Satō, Habib Abdullah, Emily Bernabe, Laura Dewey

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicChild and Adolescent Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPediatric psychologyPsychologyMedical educationApplied psychologyMedicineClinical psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Culturally appropriate, evidence-based assessments and interventions are necessary to reduce mental health and pediatric psychology disparities worldwide. Currently, there are limited opportunities for psychologists from other countries to learn clinical skills in the United States and adapt evidence-based practices to their home countries. The purpose of this paper is to share the personal perspectives of pediatric psychology international trainees and highlight opportunities for future training. We will also review how training programs may be adapted to ensure the successful dissemination of culturally applicable, evidence-based approaches in the trainees’ home countries. Considerations for training international trainees and future research potential are also discussed. A current Japanese trainee who intends to return to his home country (Japan) and a former Emirati trainee who recently returned to his home country (United Arab Emirates) reviewed the current state of pediatric psychology in their countries and shared their personal training experiences in the field of pediatric psychology in the United States. By highlighting different international trainee perspectives, we have recognized that there is a need for ongoing research that addresses how our current training guidelines support international students in pediatric psychology. International trainees in pediatric psychology are well positioned to have a positive impact in their home countries and support the global outreach of evidenced-based psychological assessment and intervention. It is crucial that the field of pediatric psychology commits to training international trainees appropriately so that they can contribute to reducing mental health disparities worldwide. Implications for Impact Statement Of psychology interns, 4–7% do not have American or Canadian citizenships, and many of them plan to return to their home countries and contribute to pediatric psychology by disseminating evidence-based practices globally. Reflecting on international trainee experiences highlights opportunities to support both their training in pediatric psychology and their transition to their home countries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.102
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.149
GPT teacher head0.602
Teacher spread0.452 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Practice in Pediatric PsychologySame topicChild and Adolescent HealthFrench-language works237,207