MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2950842335 · doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001746

Action to protect the independence and integrity of global health research

2019· editorial· en· W2950842335 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Katerini T. Storeng, Ṣẹ̀yẹ Abímbọ́lá, Dina Balabanova, David McCoy, Valéry Ridde, Véronique Filippi, Sidsel Roalkvam, Grace Akello, Melissa Parker, Jennifer Palmer

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ Global Health · 2019
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMenzies Centre for Australian Studies, King's College London, University of LondonMedical Research CouncilTata Institute of Social SciencesUniversitätsklinikum HeidelbergÉcole Normale Supérieure de LyonUniversiteit AntwerpenUniversity of Cape TownRadboud Universitair Medisch CentrumUniversidade Federal de GoiásUniversité de LiègeUniversité Paris DescartesUniversité de MontréalJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthUniversitetet i BergenUniversiteit van die VrystaatUniversität BielefeldUniversiteit StellenboschHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthKarolinska InstitutetUniversity of the Western CapeBrigham Young UniversityRadboud UniversiteitUmeå UniversitetUniversité LavalDeakin UniversityKing's College LondonCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversity of WashingtonFHI 360Curtin University of TechnologySouth African Medical Research CouncilUniversity of BathMcMaster UniversityUniversity of OxfordUniversity of Washington BothellLunds UniversitetUniversity of TorontoUniversity of AlbertaLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineYork UniversityTrinity College DublinWilfrid Laurier UniversityInstitut de Recherche pour le DéveloppementUniversity of New South WalesStrongVanderbilt UniversityLondon School of Economics and Political ScienceJames Cook UniversityUniversity College LondonUniversity of EssexWellcome TrustTulane UniversityNorges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige UniversitetUniversity of LeedsMcGill UniversityNorwegian Institute of Public HealthDalhousie UniversityUniversity of OttawaUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChitkara UniversityQueen Mary University of LondonInyuvesi Yakwazulu-NataliGeorgetown UniversityUniversitetet i OsloJohns Hopkins UniversityMonash UniversityUniversidad Austral de ChileUniversité de StrasbourgUniversity of Pennsylvania
KeywordsPublic relationsNegotiationPolitical scienceCompromiseGlobal healthCensorshipPoliticsSociologyPublic administrationHealth careLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001746

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.050
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.148
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Incentives · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.955
Threshold uncertainty score0.262

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0500.148
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.005
Bibliometrics0.0070.004
Science and technology studies0.0050.006
Scholarly communication0.0160.012
Open science0.0070.004
Research integrity0.0450.055
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.035

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.596
GPT teacher head0.613
Teacher spread0.018 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainIncentives
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations82
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJ Global HealthSame topicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeFrench-language works237,207