Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
VenueBMJ Global Health · 2019
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMenzies Centre for Australian Studies, King's College London, University of LondonMedical Research CouncilTata Institute of Social SciencesUniversitätsklinikum HeidelbergÉcole Normale Supérieure de LyonUniversiteit AntwerpenUniversity of Cape TownRadboud Universitair Medisch CentrumUniversidade Federal de GoiásUniversité de LiègeUniversité Paris DescartesUniversité de MontréalJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthUniversitetet i BergenUniversiteit van die VrystaatUniversität BielefeldUniversiteit StellenboschHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthKarolinska InstitutetUniversity of the Western CapeBrigham Young UniversityRadboud UniversiteitUmeå UniversitetUniversité LavalDeakin UniversityKing's College LondonCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversity of WashingtonFHI 360Curtin University of TechnologySouth African Medical Research CouncilUniversity of BathMcMaster UniversityUniversity of OxfordUniversity of Washington BothellLunds UniversitetUniversity of TorontoUniversity of AlbertaLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineYork UniversityTrinity College DublinWilfrid Laurier UniversityInstitut de Recherche pour le DéveloppementUniversity of New South WalesStrongVanderbilt UniversityLondon School of Economics and Political ScienceJames Cook UniversityUniversity College LondonUniversity of EssexWellcome TrustTulane UniversityNorges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige UniversitetUniversity of LeedsMcGill UniversityNorwegian Institute of Public HealthDalhousie UniversityUniversity of OttawaUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChitkara UniversityQueen Mary University of LondonInyuvesi Yakwazulu-NataliGeorgetown UniversityUniversitetet i OsloJohns Hopkins UniversityMonash UniversityUniversidad Austral de ChileUniversité de StrasbourgUniversity of Pennsylvania
KeywordsPublic relationsNegotiationPolitical scienceCompromiseGlobal healthCensorshipPoliticsSociologyPublic administrationHealth careLaw
Abstract
fetched live from OpenAlexStoreng KT, Abimbola S, Balabanova D, et al. Action to protect the independence and integrity of global health research. <em>BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH</em>. 2019;4(3): e001746.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.106
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.022
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.241
Threshold uncertainty score1.000
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Teacher spread0.018 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it