MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3005165546 · doi:10.3758/s13428-020-01365-9

Longform recordings of everyday life: Ethics for best practices

2020· article· en· W3005165546 on OpenAlexafffund
Margaret Cychosz, Rachel Romeo, Mélanie Söderström, Camila Scaff, Hillary Ganek, Alejandrina Cristià, Marisa Casillas, Kaya de Barbaro, Janet Y. Bang, Adriana Weisleder

Bibliographic record

VenueBehavior Research Methods · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChild and Animal Learning Development
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNational Institute of Mental HealthSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaUniversität ZürichNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekStanford Maternal and Child Health Research InstituteAgence Nationale de la RechercheJames S. McDonnell Foundation
KeywordsAutonomyBeneficenceSet (abstract data type)FidelityResearch ethicsComputer scienceEveryday lifeData sharingInformed consentEconomic JusticeInternet privacyData sciencePsychologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.147
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.254
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.990
Threshold uncertainty score0.776

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1470.254
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.021
Scholarly communication0.0070.006
Open science0.0040.006
Research integrity0.0100.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.841
GPT teacher head0.707
Teacher spread0.134 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
DomainMethods
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations78
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueBehavior Research MethodsSame topicChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207