Revisiting study design and methodology for pathogen reduced platelet transfusions: a round table discussion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pathogen inactivation/reduction technologies for platelet components have been developed to enhance microbial safety, and many studies have been carried out to determine whether this technique adversely affects the platelet's ability to stop or prevent bleeding. These clinical trials require inclusion of several hundred patients, are costly, and take many years to complete. To address these challenges, a meeting was organized consisting of two expert presentations followed by a roundtable discussion focused on possible new approaches to evaluate the clinical efficacy of pathogen-reduced platelets. The value of laboratory measures to provide information on platelet count after transfusion or to serve as a surrogate for bleeding risk was discussed. Also, other types of trial designs (cluster trials, stepped wedge designs, and Phase 4 postmarketing surveillance studies) as well as a clinically meaningful standardized safety endpoint to evaluate pathogen- reduced platelets were also discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.273 | 0.329 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.010 | 0.012 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".