MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence

2011· article· en· W3023552461 on OpenAlexaff
Gordon Guyatt, Andrew D Oxman, Shahnaz Sultan, Paul Glasziou, Elie A. Akl, Pablo Alonso‐Coello, David Atkins, Regina Kunz, Jan Brożek, Víctor M. Montori, Roman Jaeschke, David M. Rind, Philipp Dahm, Joerg J Meerpohl, Gunn Elisabeth Vist, Elise Berliner, Susan L. Norris, Yngve Falck–Ytter, M. Hassan Murad, Holger J. Schünemann

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuality (philosophy)MedicineMEDLINEQuality of evidenceRandomized controlled trialSurgeryPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.055
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.292
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.945
Threshold uncertainty score0.291

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0550.292
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0110.024
Bibliometrics0.0130.010
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0120.006
Research integrity0.0110.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.874
GPT teacher head0.626
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
DomainMethods
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1,332
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical EpidemiologySame topicCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersFrench-language works237,207