Differential DNA methylation analysis reveals key genes in Chinese Qingyu and Landrace pigs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Chinese Qingyu pig is a typical domestic fatty pig breed and an invaluable indigenous genetic resource in China. Compared with the Landrace pig, the Qingyu pig has unique meat characteristics, including muscle development, intramuscular fat, and other meat quality traits. At present, few studies have explored epigenetic differences due to DNA methylation between the Qingyu pig and the Landrace pig. In this study, 30 Qingyu pigs and 31 Landrace pigs were subjected to reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS). Genome-wide differential DNA methylation analysis was conducted. Six genomic regions, including regions on Sus scrofa chromosome (SSC) 1: 266.09–274.23 Mb, SSC5: 0.88–10.68 Mb, SSC8: 41.23–48.51 Mb, SSC12: 45.43–54.38 Mb, SSC13: 202.15–207.95 Mb, and SSC14: 126.43–139.85 Mb, were regarded as key regions that may be associated with phenotypic differences between the Qingyu pig and the Landrace pig. Furthermore, according to further analysis, five differentially methylated genes (ADCY1, FUBP3, GRIN2B, KIT, and PIK3R6) were identified as key candidate genes that might be associated with meat characteristics. Our findings provide new insights into the differences in DNA methylation between the Qingyu pig and the Landrace pig. These results enrich the epigenetic research of the Chinese Qingyu pig.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".