An endogenous retrovirus presumed to have been endogenized or relocated recently in a marsupial, the red-necked wallaby
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An albino infant wallaby was born to a mother with wild-type body color. PCR and sequencing analyses of TYR (encoding tyrosinase, which is essential for melanin biosynthesis) of this albino wallaby revealed a 7.1-kb-long DNA fragment inserted in the first exon. Since the fragment carried long terminal repeats, we assumed it to be a copy of an endogenous retrovirus, which we named walb. We cloned other walb copies residing in the genomes of this species and of another wallaby species. The copies exhibited length variation, and the longest copy (>8.0 kb) contained open reading frames whose deduced amino acid sequences were well aligned with those of gag, pol, and env of retroviruses. It is unknown through which of the following likely processes the walb copy was inserted into TYR: endogenization (infection of a germline cell by an exogenous virus), reinfection (infection by a virus produced from a previously endogenized provirus), or retrotransposition (intracellular relocation of a provirus). In any case, the insertion into TYR is considered to have been a recent event on an evolutionary timescale because albino mutant alleles generally do not persist for long because of their deleterious effects in wild circumstances.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".