MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4299126056 · doi:10.5937/industrija42-6319

10.5937/industrija42-6319 = Retraction: Impact of inflation on the macroeconomic indicators in transition economies (2012, vol. 40, no. 2, p. 19-34)

2014· article· en· W4299126056 on OpenAlexaffabout
Board Editorial

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrija · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobal Financial Crisis and Policies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInflation (cosmology)EconomicsEconomic historyEconomyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

At the initiative of the editors of journal Industrija and without an agreement of the authors, the article by Ranković M., Vasković V. and Simović V. is being retracted. Paper is being retracted because it plagiarises several papers including: · Li Min (2006), 'Inflation and Economic Growth: Threshold Effects and Transmission Mechanisms' Department of Economics, University of Alberta, 8-14, HM Tory Building, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2H4 · Nikola Tasic & Neven Valev (2008)'The Provision of Long-term Financing in the Transition Economies,' Working papers 14, National Bank of Serbia. · John Boyd & Bruce Champ, (2003) 'Inflation and financial market performance: what have we learned in the last ten years,' Working Paper 0317, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland. · Vikesh Gokal & Subrina Hanif (2004) 'Relationship between inflation and Economic growth' Working Paper 2004/04 December, Economics Department Reserve Bank of Fiji, Suva, Fiji Plagiarised text constitutes over 47% of the published paper. Editors have attempted to contact first and other authors on several occasions, but there was no response. Therefore the editors have decided to retract this paper without the agreement with the authors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.250
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrijaSame topicGlobal Financial Crisis and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207