MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386636748 · doi:10.1016/j.stemcr.2023.08.003

ISSCR standards for the use of human stem cells in basic research

2023· review· en· W4386636748 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueStem Cell Reports · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPluripotent Stem Cells Research
Canadian institutionsStem Cell Network
FundersEuropean Research CouncilMedical Research CouncilTohoku UniversityMinistry of Health and WelfareMinistry of Science, ICT and Future PlanningEngineering Research CentersKanagawa Institute of Industrial Science and TechnologyNagoya City UniversityWistar InstituteUK Regenerative Medicine PlatformUniversity of TokyoSimons Foundation Autism Research InitiativeSimons FoundationBurroughs Wellcome FundNational Research Foundation of KoreaMassachusetts Department of Agricultural ResourcesFaculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of AlbertaWisconsin Alumni Research FoundationFrancis Crick InstituteWellcome TrustNovo Nordisk FondenCancer Research UKDoris Duke Charitable Foundation
KeywordsStem cellBiologyInduced pluripotent stem cellBiotechnologyBasic researchRisk analysis (engineering)Engineering ethicsBiochemical engineeringData scienceComputer scienceBusinessLibrary scienceCell biologyEmbryonic stem cellEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The laboratory culture of human stem cells seeks to capture a cellular state as an in vitro surrogate of a biological system. For the results and outputs from this research to be accurate, meaningful, and durable, standards that ensure reproducibility and reliability of the data should be applied. Although such standards have been previously proposed for repositories and distribution centers, no widely accepted best practices exist for laboratory research with human pluripotent and tissue stem cells. To fill that void, the International Society for Stem Cell Research has developed a set of recommendations, including reporting criteria, for scientists in basic research laboratories. These criteria are designed to be technically and financially feasible and, when implemented, enhance the reproducibility and rigor of stem cell research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.808
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.220
GPT teacher head0.425
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it