MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6925378919 · doi:10.17863/cam.50374

Eleven grand challenges in single-cell data science.

2020· article· en· W6925378919 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueApollo (University of Cambridge) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanics and Biomechanics Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of GeneticsNational Human Genome Research InstituteCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of CambridgeHelmholtz Zentrum MünchenBC Cancer AgencyNational Health and Medical Research CouncilEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilNational Institutes of HealthOncode InstituteBC Cancer FoundationTerry Fox Research InstituteI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical UniversityAlan Turing InstituteSwiss Institute of BioinformaticsUniversität ZürichKlaus Tschira StiftungCycle for SurvivalRadboud Universitair Medisch CentrumUniversitair Medisch Centrum GroningenMedical Research CouncilLeids Universitair Medisch CentrumCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekEidgenössische Technische Hochschule ZürichBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungUniversität des SaarlandesInstitute for Research in BiomedicineTechnische Universiteit DelftUniversiteit UtrechtRijksuniversiteit GroningenDeutsche KrebshilfeUniversiteit LeidenSystemsX.chSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungCanadian Cancer Society Research InstituteMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer CenterWellcome TrustWageningen University and ResearchCancer Research UKRadboud UniversiteitBarcelona Institute of Science and TechnologyEuropean Molecular Biology LaboratoryDeutsches KrebsforschungszentrumUniversiteit van AmsterdamGeorgia State UniversitySilicon Valley Community FoundationPrinceton UniversityJohns Hopkins UniversityBroad InstituteUniversität Duisburg-EssenUniversity of ConnecticutNational Science FoundationMassachusetts General HospitalImperial College London
KeywordsNucleofectionGestational periodTSG101DysgeusiaLiquationDiafiltrationEmperipolesisDurvalumabFusible alloy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The recent boom in microfluidics and combinatorial indexing strategies, combined with low sequencing costs, has empowered single-cell sequencing technology. Thousands-or even millions-of cells analyzed in a single experiment amount to a data revolution in single-cell biology and pose unique data science problems. Here, we outline eleven challenges that will be central to bringing this emerging field of single-cell data science forward. For each challenge, we highlight motivating research questions, review prior work, and formulate open problems. This compendium is for established researchers, newcomers, and students alike, highlighting interesting and rewarding problems for the coming years.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.748
Threshold uncertainty score0.456

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.114 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApollo (University of Cambridge)Same topicMechanics and Biomechanics StudiesFrench-language works237,207