MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6990290593

A Cultural and Global Perspective on Academic Integrity Policies and Misconduct Procedures, and their Impact on International Student Success

2025· dissertation· en· W6990290593 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor) · 2025
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAcademic integrity and plagiarism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcademic integrityMisconductPerspective (graphical)Academic standardsLearning developmentHigher educationDisciplineNeglect
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canada is a top destination for international students, attracting students from diverse cultures and academic backgrounds. However, international students often encounter challenges in adapting to Canadian academic integrity standards due to differing definitions of plagiarism, citation practices, and academic misconduct procedures in their home country. This study explores how native academic culture shapes one’s understanding of academic integrity and how this perspective influences academic success in first or second year of study in Canada. Through semi-structured interviews with sixteen international students and analyses of twelve academic integrity policies and misconduct procedures, this study examines the gap in institutional support, the effectiveness of current academic integrity education, and the impact of cultural differences in academic integrity standards and academic misconduct management. The findings suggest that many international students experience a steep learning curve in understanding and applying Canadian academic integrity standards, often due to lack of prior exposure. Additionally, academic integrity policies and misconduct procedures often neglect explicit consideration of international students and diverse academic backgrounds. This study concludes by providing recommendations for Ontario post-secondary institutions to enhance clarity, accessibility, and cultural inclusivity when revising academic integrity policies, misconduct procedures, and support services. By fostering a more inclusive approach that emphasizes educational equity, colleges and universities can equip international students for academic success while maintaining the quality of Canadian higher education. Keywords: Academic integrity, international students, academic misconduct, enculturation, acculturation, policy review, language acquisition, English language learners

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.022
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.041
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.999
Threshold uncertainty score0.379

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0220.041
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.009
Science and technology studies0.0080.011
Scholarly communication0.0090.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
DomainMethods
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)Same topicAcademic integrity and plagiarismFrench-language works237,207