MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Judgment and Decision Making
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

61 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20062025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
61 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 2

Labels cover 0 of 61 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 61 of 61 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated teacher distillation outputs. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

fundno affunlabeled
Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk
Gabriele Paolacci, Jesse Chandler, Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis
2010· article· en· Judgment and Decision Making· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3,803
citations
afffundunlabeled
On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bullshit
Gordon Pennycook, James Allan Cheyne, Nathaniel Barr, Derek J. Koehler, Jonathan A. Fugelsang
2015· article· en· Judgment and Decision Making· Neuroscience
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
556
citations
affunlabeled
Are neoliberals more susceptible to bullshit?
Joanna Sterling, John T. Jost, Gordon Pennycook
2016· article· en· Judgment and Decision Making· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
98
citations
afffundunlabeled
Bullshit makes the art grow profounder
Martin Harry Turpin, Alexander C. Walker, Mane Kara-Yakoubian, Nina N. Gabert, Jonathan A. Fugelsang, Jennifer A. Stolz
2019· article· en· Judgment and Decision Making· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
42
citations
afffundunlabeled
It’s still bullshit: Reply to Dalton (2016)
Gordon Pennycook, James Allan Cheyne, Nathaniel Barr, Derek J. Koehler, Jonathan A. Fugelsang
2016· article· en· Judgment and Decision Making· Neuroscience
distilled prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
31
citations
affunlabeled
Westerners underestimate global inequality
Ignazio Ziano, Ivuoma N. Onyeador, Nandita Dhanda
2024· article· en· Judgment and Decision Making· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
next →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About