MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Religion, Society, and Development
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,610 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,610 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 14 of 33

Labels cover 4 of 1,610 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,610 of 1,610 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affaboutunlabeled
God seeks and creates community
Stephen Kristenson
2008· article· en· Consensus· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
NGO Power: A Questionable Panacea
MARIE PIERRE CHEVRIER
2006· article· en· International Studies Review· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Notes on contributors
Johannes Ljungberg, Erik Sidenvall
2023· book-chapter· en· Manchester University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Acknowledgements
Johannes Ljungberg, Erik Sidenvall
2023· book-chapter· en· Manchester University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
affunlabeled
The Good Samaritan
Allen Jorgenson
2008· article· en· Consensus· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
fundno affno abstractunlabeled
Doris Duke Charitable Foundation (DDCF)
2023· book-chapter· en· Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Mission Institution
Trevor D. Bell, Simon Kwoon‐Ho Chow, González Guitián C, Jayatilleke Y.D, Pablo Oyarzún R., Ronald L. Small
2017· book-chapter· en· University of Ottawa Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Overcoming Conflicting Loyalties
Robert Pynn, Irene Sevcik, Michael Rothery, Nancy Nason‐Clark
2015· book· en· University of Alberta Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
7 Layering Faith and Choice in Alberta
James Farney, Clark Banack
2023· book-chapter· en· University of Toronto Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Examining Evangelicals in Canada and the US
Sam Reimer
2003· book-chapter· en· McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
10.3917/etu.hs21.0121
2000· article· en· Time to knit· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About