MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Gender, Feminism, and Media
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,631 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,631 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 15 of 33

Labels cover 0 of 1,631 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,631 of 1,631 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

fundno affunlabeled
Queer Throughlines
Ju Hui Han
2025· book· en· University of Michigan Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Pater for Millions
Michael Humphrey
2023· article· en· Persona Studies· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
e-brides: The Mail-Order Bride Industry
Julie Pehar
2003· article· en· Canadian women's studies· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Heterosexist Suspicion of a Queer Outsider
Quinn I McGlade-Ferentzy
2020· dissertation· en· The Atrium (University of Guelph)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Who the Computer Sees: Race, Gender, and AI
Carla Fehr
2025· book-chapter· en· Boston studies in the philosophy of science· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
1
citations
afffundunlabeled
Towards planetary-intimate social media research
Elisabeth Militz, Marlene Benzinger, Roberta Hawkins
2025· article· en· Digital Geography and Society· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Forum: Feminism in German Studies
Monika Shafi, Faye Stewart, Tiffany N. Florvil, Kerry Wallach, Beverly M. Weber, Hester Baer +2 more
2018· article· en· The German Quarterly· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Sexting for the Right Reasons: A Longitudinal Mediation Study
Sandra Meier, Silvia Marin-Dragu, Jennifer McArthur, Marcus Cormier, Simal Dölek, Julie Blais +3 more
2025· article· en· Archives of Sexual Behavior· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Rape Culture
Gerald Walton
2024· book-chapter· en· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About