MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,406 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,406 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 16 of 29

Labels cover 3 of 1,406 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,406 of 1,406 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
Cumulative Impacts and Environmental Values
Michael P. Gillingham, Chris J. Johnson
2016· book-chapter· en· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
PNAS establishes a Statistical Review Committee
Adrian E. Raftery, Alicia L. Carriquiry, Michael J. Daniels, Constantine Gatsonis, Steven N. Goodman, Amy H. Herring +1 more
2023· review· en· Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Learned Discourses
Peter M. Chapman
2007· article· en· Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Setting High Standards for Environmental Practice
Bill Haylock
2006· article· en· Australasian Journal of Environmental Management· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Precautionary Principle
John H. Duffus, Monica Nordberg, Douglas M. Templeton
2016· dataset· en· IUPAC Standards Online· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Strategic Environmental Assessment in France
Pierre Scriabine
2002· article· en· The journal of the INCE of Japan· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About