MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

996 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
996 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 16 of 20

Labels cover 2 of 996 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 996 of 996 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Enbug
David Williams-King, John Aycock, Daniel Medeiros Nunes de Castro
2010· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Simulink Mutation Testing using CodeBERT
J. Y. Zhang, Delaram Ghobari, Mehrdad Sabetzadeh, Shiva Nejati
2025· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
afffundunlabeled
Alternative B-Sequences
Lihua Duan, Jessica Chen
2007· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
afffundunlabeled
Merging Test Models
Mohamed Mussa, Ferhat Khendek
2013· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Enhanced Traverse of Web Pages
Lihua Duan, Yan Wang, Jessica Chen
2007· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
fundno affunlabeled
DaMAT: A Data-driven Mutation Analysis Tool
Enrico Viganò, Oscar Cornejo, Fabrizio Pastore, Lionel Briand
2023· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
ATUA: an update-driven app testing tool
Chanh-Duc Ngo, Fabrizio Pastore, Lionel Briand
2022· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Contents
2002· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundunlabeled
DScribe
Alexa Hernandez, Mathieu Nassif, Martin P. Robillard
2022· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About