MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,054 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,054 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 17 of 22

Labels cover 0 of 1,054 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,054 of 1,054 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

aboutno affunlabeled
Midbrain puts the pace in mice
Jan Stenum
2018· article· en· Journal of Experimental Biology· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Nanaimo Free Press [Friday, January 28, 1898]
2019· other· en· VIUSpace (Vancouver Island University Library)· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Order and Chaos In Mitotic Clocks
Berj L. Bardakjian, L.B. Jemaa, José Carlos Teixeira de Barros Moraes
2005· article· en· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
A toolbox for ablating excitatory and inhibitory synapses
Aida Bareghamyan, Changfeng Deng, Sarah Daoudi, Xiaocen Lu, Wei Zhang, Robert E. Campbell +3 more
2024· preprint· en· bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundunlabeled
Different species, different gap junctions?
Rafael Sanz-Gálvez, Arlette Kolta
2023· letter· en· The Journal of General Physiology· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
holoviz/panel: Version 1.0.2
2023· other· en· Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
David Yue (1957–2014)
Wayne R. Giles, Gerald W. Zamponi
2015· article· en· The Journal of Physiology· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Endergonic (or Endoergic) Reaction
Keith J. Laidler
2016· dataset· en· IUPAC Standards Online· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About