MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,076 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,076 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 2 of 42

Labels cover 5 of 2,076 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,076 of 2,076 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
JXTA performance study
Emir Halepovic, Ralph Deters
2004· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
34
citations
affunlabeled
Particle Physics Booklet 2008
2008· report· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
33
citations
afffundaboutno abstractunlabeled
GridX1: A Canadian computational grid
Arun Agarwal, Mohamed Ben Ahmed, Avery Berman, B. Caron, André Charbonneau, Denice Deatrich +21 more
2007· article· en· Future Generation Computer Systems· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
31
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Search-Based Software Engineering
Márcio de Oliveira Barros, Yvan Labiche
2015· book· en· Lecture notes in computer science· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
30
citations
affunlabeled
Mobile interfaces to computational, data, and service grid systems
Mauro Migliardi, Muthucumaru Maheswaran, Balasubramaniam Maniymaran, Paul Card, Farag Azzedin
2002· article· en· ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
29
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
PaGrid: A Mesh Partitioner for Computational Grids
Sili Huang, Eric Aubanel, Virendrakumar C. Bhavsar
2006· article· en· Journal of Grid Computing· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
25
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
High performance computing and communications
Keqiu Li, Geyong Min, Laurence T. Yang, Yongquan Wei
2009· article· en· The Journal of Supercomputing· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
24
citations
afffundunlabeled
Robotics: Science and Systems X
Timothy D. Barfoot, Chi Hay Tong, Simo Särkkä
2014· paratext· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
23
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About