MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Humor Studies and Applications
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

576 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
576 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 2 of 12

Labels cover 2 of 576 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 576 of 576 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
More Than Trivial
Ruth Anne Kinsman Dean, David Gregory
2005· article· en· Cancer Nursing· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
47
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Humor styles across 28 countries
Julie Aitken Schermer, Radosław Rogoza, Maria Magdalena Kwiatkowska, Christopher Marcin Kowalski, Sibele D. Aquino, Rahkman Ardi +34 more
2019· article· en· Current Psychology· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
47
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Humor perception deficits in schizophrenia
Joseph Polimeni, Jeffrey P. Reiss
2006· article· en· Psychiatry Research· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
45
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
The Clinical Psychology of Humor
Rod A. Martin, Thomas E. Ford
2018· book-chapter· en· Elsevier eBooks· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
35
citations
affunlabeled
Humor and Oncology
Anthony M. Joshua, Angela Cotroneo, Stephen Clarke
2005· article· en· Journal of Clinical Oncology· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
33
citations
affunlabeled
What’s So Funny?
Rachel Gouin
2004· article· en· Qualitative Research· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
30
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About