MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
The American Journal of Bioethics
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

463 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20012025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
463 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 2 of 10

Labels cover 2 of 463 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 463 of 463 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Criteria for Authorship in Bioethics
David B. Resnik, Zubin Master
2011· article· en· The American Journal of Bioethics· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · none
20
citations
fundaboutno affunlabeled
Risks to Relatives in Genomic Research: A Duty to Warn?
Yvonne Bombard, Kenneth Offit, Mark E. Robson
2012· letter· en· The American Journal of Bioethics· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · research_integrityconsensus · none
20
citations
affunlabeled
Neuroethics, New Ethics?
Bartha Maria Knoppers
2005· letter· en· The American Journal of Bioethics· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
17
citations
affunlabeled
When Argument Fails
Charles Weijer
2002· article· en· The American Journal of Bioethics· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
14
citations
affunlabeled
Defining Conscience and Acting Conscientiously
Claudia Emerson, Abdallah S. Daar
2007· letter· en· The American Journal of Bioethics· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
14
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Physician Obligation in Oocyte Procurement
Jeffrey A. Nisker
2001· article· en· The American Journal of Bioethics· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
14
citations
affunlabeled
Brain Privacy: How Can We Protect It?
Sheri A. Alpert
2007· letter· en· The American Journal of Bioethics· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
14
citations
affunlabeled
Sunk Cost Bias and Withdrawal Aversion
Martin Harry Turpin, Ethan Andrew Meyers, Jonathan A. Fugelsang, Ori Friedman, Michał Białek
2019· letter· en· The American Journal of Bioethics· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
13
citations
affunlabeled
Mapping Metaphors and Analogies
José Julián López
2006· letter· en· The American Journal of Bioethics· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
13
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About