MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,268 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,268 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 22 of 26

Labels cover 7 of 1,268 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,268 of 1,268 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
10_A6.tar.017
2021· dataset· en· Research Data Repository, Duke University· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
The Environmental Exposure Unit (EEU)
James Day
2003· article· en· Allergy & Clinical Immunology International - Journal of the World Allergy Organization· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Utilización energética de la biomasa
Ecologistas en Acción. Comisión de Energía
2002· article· en· El Ecologista· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
LCA Software: TEAM<sup>TM</sup>
Yasuhiko Morita, Akiko Gosho
2005· article· en· Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Japan· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundaboutunlabeled
Big and Little Feet Provincial Profiles: Manitoba
Sarah Dobson, G. Kent Fellows
2017· article· en· The School of Public Policy Publications· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
LCI Case Studies
2001· other· en· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
40544 Comparison of Energy consumption and CO_2 emissions due to Building construction between Canada and Japan
Ryuichi Nakajima, Tadakazu Urano, Syunsuke Kaidou, Noriyoshi Yokoo, Tatsuo OKA
2011· article· en· Summaries of technical papers of Annual Meeting Architectural Institute of Japan. D-1, Environmental engineering I, Room acoustics and acoustic environment noise and solidborne sound environmental vibration light and color water supply and drainage water environment urban installation and environmental management environmental psychology and physiology environmental design electro-magnetic environment· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About