MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

3,010 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
3,010 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 22 of 61

Labels cover 6 of 3,010 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 3,010 of 3,010 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

aboutno affunlabeled
The Story of Orthopaedics
Riad Barmada
2000· article· en· Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
COMPARISON OF TECHNIQUES TO MEASURE MUSCLE GLYCOGEN USE
Christopher R. Harvey, Daniel Massicotte, F. P ronnet, Nancy J. Rehrer
2003· article· en· Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Response
Joshua D. Ruddy, Nirav Maniar, Morgan Williams, Steven Duhig, Ryan G. Timmins, Jack Hickey +2 more
2018· letter· en· Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Weather Conditions for Optimal Marathon Performance
Matthew R. Ely, Samuel N. Cheuvront, Scott J. Montain
2007· article· en· Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Response
Pénélope Paradis‐Deschênes, Denis R. Joanisse, François Billaut
2018· letter· en· Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affaboutunlabeled
HealtheSteps Process Evaluation
Wendy Blunt, Dawn P. Gill, Brendan Riggin, Judith Belle Brown, Robert J. Petrella
2018· article· en· Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
1
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About