MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Media Studies and Communication
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,390 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,390 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 23 of 28

Labels cover 4 of 1,390 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,390 of 1,390 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

venueaboutno affunlabeled
Canadian Television Today (review)
David Tucker
2008· article· en· University of Toronto Quarterly· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
10.1016/s0029-7437(07)70465-2
2000· article· en· Time to knit· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Preface
Rafał Kuś
2022· article· pl· Zarządzanie Mediami· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affvenueunlabeled
Book Review: The Reason You Walk
Crystal McLeod, Nikesh Adunuri
2019· article· en· International Indigenous Policy Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Editorial
Silke Fürst, Sébastien Salerno
2021· editorial· en· Studies in Communication Sciences· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Every Newsphoto Tells a Story
Patience Wheatley
2003· article· en· Canadian women's studies· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affvenueunlabeled
Editorial
David Mitchell
2004· editorial· en· Canadian Journal of Communication· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Konstruktiv journalistik:Behov og baggrund, mål og modeller
Orla Borg, Peter Bro, Cathrine Gyldensted, Ulrik Haagerup, Vigdis Holmaas, Brian Holst +5 more
2024· book· da· University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Are babies prizes or gifts
MargaretSomerville
2011· article· en· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
LGBTQ2S Across Canada
Bettina Heinz
2022· book-chapter· en· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About