MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,524 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,524 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 28 of 31

Labels cover 1 of 1,524 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,524 of 1,524 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Haptic Perception
Susan J. Lederman, Ryo Kitada, Dianne Pawluk
2010· other· en· The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affvenueunlabeled
IMPLANTABLE PROSTHESES FOR THE INNER EAR
Christina Goodvin, Edward J. Park
2011· article· en· Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Text in Braille
Sonya Kloostera
2013· article· en· ti<· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Artificial aid kit for visually impaired
Sri Jahnavi Narsineni, Eshrath Shaik, Navya Kalluru, Hemalatha Murugan
2025· article· en· AIP conference proceedings· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundunlabeled
HAPTIC FEEDBACK FOR DIFFERENT STROKES USING DIMPLE
Mark Zadel, Stephen Sinclair, Marcelo M. Wanderley
2009· article· en· The Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Haptic information enhances auditory speech perception
Kristín M. Jóhannsdóttir, Diana Gibrail, Gick Bryan, Yoko Ikegami, Jeff Muehlbauer
2005· article· en· The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms
Sarah D’Amour, Laurence R. Harris
2016· article· en· Journal of Visualized Experiments· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
A New Haptic Interaction Paradigm
Aakar Gupta, Thomas Pietrzak
2016· preprint· en· LillOA (Université de Lille (University Of Lille))· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
General Terms
2014· article· en· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About