MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

3,873 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20012025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
3,873 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 28 of 78

Labels cover 1 of 3,873 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 3,873 of 3,873 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Properties and nature of Be stars
D. Ruždjak, H. Božić, P. Harmanec, Roman Fiřt, P. Chadima, K. S. Bjorkman +9 more
2009· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
41
citations
affunlabeled
Carbon star survey in the Local Group
P. Battinelli, S. Demers
2004· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
40
citations
affunlabeled
Large Interstellar Polarisation Survey (LIPS)
S. Bagnulo, N. L. J. Cox, Aleksandar Cikota, R. Siebenmorgen, Н. В. Вощинников, F. Patat +5 more
2017· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
40
citations
afffundunlabeled
The large scale dust lanes of the Galactic bar
D. J. Marshall, R. Fux, A. C. Robin, C. Reylé
2007· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
40
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Molecular gas in NUclei of GAlaxies (NUGA)
V. Casasola, F. Combes, S. García‐Burillo, L. K. Hunt, S. Léon, A. J. Baker
2008· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
40
citations
affunlabeled
<i>Planck</i>intermediate results
N. Aghanim, M. I. R. Alves, M. Arnaud, D. Arzoumanian, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi +187 more
2015· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
40
citations
afffundunlabeled
Highlights from the first year of Odin observations
Åke Hjalmarson, U. Frisk, M. Olberg, P. Bergman, P. F. Bernath, N. Biver +52 more
2003· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
40
citations
affunlabeled
The VIMOS Public Extragalactic Redshift Survey (VIPERS)
O. Cucciati, I. Davidzon, M. Bolzonella, B. R. Granett, G. De Lucia, E. Branchini +34 more
2017· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
40
citations
fundno affunlabeled
The eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey (eFEDS)
Matthias Klein, Masamune Oguri, J. J. Mohr, S. Grandis, V. Ghirardini, Teng Liu +16 more
2021· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
40
citations
afffundunlabeled
Thin disk kinematics from RAVE and the solar motion
S. Pasetto, E. K. Grebel, T. Zwitter, C. Chiosi, G. Bertelli, O. Bienaymé +11 more
2012· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
40
citations
affunlabeled
A new near-IR window of low extinction in the Galactic plane
D. Minniti, R. K. Saito, O. A. González, J. Alonso-García, M. Rejkuba, R. H. Barbá +4 more
2018· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
39
citations
afffundaboutunlabeled
Testing the forward modeling approach in asteroseismology
V. Van Grootel, S. Charpinet, G. Fontaine, P. Brassard, E. M. Green, P. Chayer +1 more
2008· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
39
citations
affunlabeled
The VIMOS Public Extragalactic Redshift Survey (VIPERS)
Faizan G Mohammad, D. Bianchi, Will J. Percival, S. de la Torre, L. Guzzo, B. R. Granett +31 more
2018· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
39
citations
afffundunlabeled
Stellar feedback in M 83 as observed with MUSE
Lorenza Della Bruna, A. Adamo, Anna F. McLeod, L. J. Smith, Gabriel Savard, Carmelle Robert +8 more
2022· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
39
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About