MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences)
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

148 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20012025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
148 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 3 of 3

Labels cover 0 of 148 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 148 of 148 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

aboutno affunlabeled
Charles Taylor and the (Modern) Self
Ciprian Bogdan
2007· article· en· Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Technology and Work: New Sociological Approaches?
António Moniz
2018· article· en· Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Global NATO or global partnerships
Simon Koschut
2007· article· en· Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Legitimacy in a Federal System
2016· other· en· Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Archivist on Board: Contributions to the Research Team
2010· article· de· Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences)· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
1943 em Angola
2014· other· en· Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Jahresbericht 2023
2024· other· de· Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences)
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
All dressed up and nowhere to go: PIAAC in Canada
2018· other· en· Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences)· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About