MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Gambling Behavior and Treatments
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,819 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,819 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 31 of 57

Labels cover 14 of 2,819 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,819 of 2,819 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundunlabeled
Qualitative Experience of Self-Exclusion Programs: A Scoping Review
Cyril Devault-Tousignant, Nicolas Lavoie, Mélissa Côté, Sophie Audette-Chapdelaine, Anne-Marie Auger, Anders Håkansson +1 more
2023· review· en· International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
affunlabeled
Boredom, sport, and games
J.S. Russell
2024· article· en· Journal of the Philosophy of Sport· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
affunlabeled
Regulation of online gambling
Ingo Fiedler
2018· article· en· Economics and Business Letters· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
afffundunlabeled
Nudge theory and gambling: a scoping review
Marie-Ève Fortier, Sophie Audette-Chapdelaine, Anne-Marie Auger, Magaly Brodeur
2024· review· en· Frontiers in Public Health· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Imaging the Gambling Brain
Iris M. Balodis, Marc N. Potenza
2016· review· en· International review of neurobiology· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Women problem gamblers want more
Noëlla A. Piquette-Tomei, Sonya Corbin Dwyer, Erika Norman, Evelyn McCaslin, Jody Burnet
2007· article· en· Open ULeth Scholarship (OPUS) (University of Lethbridge)· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
affvenuegpt · no categorygrok · no categoryopus · no categorymodels agree
Sports Bettors: A Systematic Review
Jonathan Mercier, Serge Sévigny, Christian Jacques, Annie Goulet, Michael Cantinotti, Isabelle Giroux
2018· review· en· Journal of Gambling Issues· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Comings and Goings at the JGI
Sherry H. Stewart
2015· article· en· Journal of Gambling Issues· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About