MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,232 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,232 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 32 of 45

Labels cover 8 of 2,232 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,232 of 2,232 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

venueno affno abstractunlabeled
10.1016/j.ynpm.2014.07.006
2000· article· en· Time to knit· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
1
citations
affunlabeled
The normal way of birth?
Lesley Page
2001· article· en· British Journal of Midwifery· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Caesareans by request.
Barbara Davies
2012· article· en· PubMed· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Bioethics in Childbirth Care: Protocol for a Scoping Review
Graziani Izidoro Ferreira, Kevin Haley Barbosa, André Di Carlo Araújo Duarte, César de Oliveira, Dirce Guilhem
2021· review· en· JMIR Research Protocols· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
The first stage of labour
Sambit Mukhopadhyay, David Fraser
2009· book-chapter· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affvenueno abstractunlabeled
Effect of Hospital Choice on the Risk of Caesarean Delivery
Dong Bach Nguyen, Valerie Pare-Miron, Nicholas Czuzoj‐Shulman, Haim A. Abenhaim
2019· article· en· Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Editorial
Stephen E. Lapinsky, Charlotte Frise
2018· editorial· en· Obstetric Medicine· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
10.1016/b978-0-7020-5185-2.00010-4
2000· book-chapter· en· Time to knit· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
1
citations
affunlabeled
Foreword
Roger Newman
2015· article· en· Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About