MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,130 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,130 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 4 of 43

Labels cover 1 of 2,130 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,130 of 2,130 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated teacher distillation outputs. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

aboutno affunlabeled
Judiciaries in Comparative Perspective
Hoong Lee
2011· book· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaepi_narrowconsensus · none
22
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Explaining Dissent on the Supreme Court of Canada
Donald R. Songer, John Szmer, Susan W. Johnson
2011· article· fr· Canadian Journal of Political Science· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
22
citations
affunlabeled
The Constitutional Itch
Peer Zumbansen
2015· book-chapter· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · sts
20
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
The interpretation of legislation in Canada
Keith Sahapattana
2016· article· en· Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
20
citations
venueaboutno affunlabeled
Judicial Power and Canadian Democracy
Troy Riddell, P. David Howe, Peter H. Russell
2002· article· en· Canadian Public Policy· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · sts+insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
20
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Delegating Rights Protection
David Erdos
2010· book· en· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · sts+insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
19
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Women Lawyers before the Supreme Court of Canada
Erin B. Kaheny, John Szmer, Tammy A. Sarver
2011· article· en· Canadian Journal of Political Science· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
18
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About