MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

759 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
759 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 4 of 16

Labels cover 20 of 759 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 759 of 759 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
Reliability and Validity in Neuropsychology
Elisabeth M. S. Sherman, Brian L. Brooks, Grant L. Iverson, Daniel J. Slick, Esther Strauss
2010· book-chapter· en· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
31
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Measurement Properties of the Multiple Errands Test: A Systematic Review
Shlomit Rotenberg, Moira Ruthralingam, Brett Hnatiw, Kimberley Neufeld, Kirstin E. Yuzwa, Ifah Arbel +1 more
2020· review· en· Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
29
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Minimal evidence of response shift in the absence of a catalyst
Sara Ahmed, Richard Sawatzky, Jean‐Frédéric Lévesque, Deborah Ehrmann-Feldman, Carolyn E. Schwartz
2014· article· en· Quality of Life Research· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
26
citations
venueno affgemma · no categorygpt · no categorymodels split
Notes to Factor Analysis Techniques for Construct Validity
Mousa Alavi, Erik Biroš, Michelle Cleary
2023· article· en· Canadian Journal of Nursing Research· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
25
citations
affunlabeled
Psychometric Assessment and Reporting Practices
Kathleen L. Slaney, Masha Tkatchouk, Stephanie M. Gabriel, Michael D. Maraun
2009· article· en· Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
21
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Using the Self-Directed Search in Research
Sarah-Caroline Poitras, Frédéric Guay, Catherine F. Ratelle
2011· article· en· Journal of Career Development· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
19
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About