MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Cultural Industries and Urban Development
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,719 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,719 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 40 of 55

Labels cover 10 of 2,719 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,719 of 2,719 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

aboutno affunlabeled
Communications history and policy: introduction to section II
Robin Mansell
2008· book-chapter· en· London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Executive Editor's Introduction
Jonathan Paquette
2018· article· en· The Journal of Arts Management Law and Society· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Community Power Shifts with Scenes
Daniel Aaron Silver, Christopher Graziul, Terry Nichols Clark
2013· article· en· SSRN Electronic Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
La ville en jeu : Vancouver
Benoît Raoulx
2004· book-chapter· fr· HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affaboutunlabeled
RiP: A Remix Manifesto
Laura J. Murray
2009· article· en· SSRN Electronic Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Polarizing Uses of Older Age
Anita Wohlmann
2024· article· en· Age Culture Humanities An Interdisciplinary Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affvenueaboutunlabeled
Editorial
Hudson Moura
2021· editorial· en· Interactive Film and Media Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Sofia 2005
Ron Holloway
2006· article· en· Kinema A Journal for Film and Audiovisual Media· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
The Numbers Game
Brad Lepp
2016· article· en· Canadian Theatre Review· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About