MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Labor Movements and Unions
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

4,123 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
4,123 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 43 of 83

Labels cover 6 of 4,123 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 4,123 of 4,123 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

aboutno affunlabeled
Paying for Performance
Michelle Brown, John S. Heywood
2019· book-chapter· en· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Institutions and Work
Bill Kaghan, Michael Lounsbury
2010· article· en· SSRN Electronic Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affvenueaboutunlabeled
An Outlook on Labour Relations in Canada
A. W. R. Carrothers
2005· article· en· Relations industrielles· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Report: Bargaining Over Corporate Investment
Herman Rosenfel, Sam Gindin
2016· article· en· International Union Rights· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Washington Forts of the Fur Trade Regime
O. B. Sperlin
2010· article· en· ˜The œWashington historical quarterly· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
In unity there's strength!
James Clancy
2010· article· en· International Union Rights· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Industrial relations legislation in Canada
Cornelius Resetnikova
2017· article· en· Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueaboutno affunlabeled
Who Wants Collective Bargaining Any Way?
A. W. R. Carrothers
2005· article· en· Relations industrielles· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Nationalism and Internationalism
Robert X. Ware
2018· book-chapter· en· Marx, Engels, and Marxisms· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
De svenska partierna och Lavaldomen
Karl-Göran Algotsson
2011· article· sv· Statsvetenskaplig tidskrift· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About