MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Analytic Number Theory Research
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

974 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
974 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 5 of 20

Labels cover 0 of 974 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 974 of 974 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Conjectures of Cheng and Ramadanov
Stefan Nemirovski, Ruslan G Shafikov
2006· article· en· Russian Mathematical Surveys· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
10
citations
afffundunlabeled
Square-free values of quadratic polynomials
John Friedlander, Henryk Iwaniec
2010· article· en· Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
10
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Mahler Measure of Multivariable Polynomials
Marie-José Bertin, Matilde Laĺın
2013· other· en· Contemporary mathematics - American Mathematical Society· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
10
citations
affunlabeled
The Distribution of Prime Numbers
Dimitris Koukoulopoulos
2019· book· en· Graduate studies in mathematics· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
10
citations
affunlabeled
Denser Egyptian fractions
Greg Martin
2000· article· en· Acta Arithmetica· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
10
citations
venueno affunlabeled
On the Distribution of the Prime Numbers
Lolav Ahmed Khalil
2024· article· en· Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
9
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
On Dirichlet Series for Sums of Squares
Jonathan M. Borwein, Kwok-Kwong Stephen Choi
2003· article· en· The Ramanujan Journal· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
9
citations
affvenueunlabeled
A Note on Giuga's Conjecture
Vicentiu Tipu
2007· article· en· Canadian Mathematical Bulletin· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
9
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Note Concerning an Odd Langford Sequence
Václav Linek
2001· article· en· European Journal of Combinatorics· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
9
citations
affunlabeled
Close Lattice Points on Circles
Javier Cilleruelo, Andrew Granville
2009· article· en· Canadian Journal of Mathematics· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
8
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About