MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Optical measurement and interference techniques
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

518 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
518 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 5 of 11

Labels cover 1 of 518 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 518 of 518 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

venueno affunlabeled
3D Stereo Reconstruction of SEM Images
Juan C. Henao-Londono, Juan Rojas, Juan-Bernardo Gómez-Mendoza, E. Restrepo-Parra
2018· article· en· Modern Applied Science· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
afffundunlabeled
Modelling extreme wide‐angle lens cameras
Derek D. Lichti, Wynand Tredoux, Reza Maalek, Petra Helmholz, Robert Radovanovic
2021· article· en· The Photogrammetric Record· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Fringe Projection Profilometry
Cheng Jiang, Yixuan Li, Shijie Feng, Yan Hu, Wei Yin, Jiaming Qian +2 more
2024· book-chapter· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
affunlabeled
Aspheric lens mounting
Frédéric Lamontagne, Ulrike Fuchs, Martin Trabert, Anna Möhl
2018· article· en· Optical Engineering· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
affunlabeled
Hierarchical characterization procedures for dimensional metrology
David MacKinnon, J.‐A. Beraldin, Luc Cournoyer, Benjamin Carrier
2010· article· en· Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
affaboutunlabeled
A 3D scanning system for biomedical purposes
Beverly D. Bradley, Adrian D. C. Chan, M. John D. Hayes
2009· article· en· International Journal of Advanced Media and Communication· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
A point diffraction interferometer with random-dot filter
Hideo Furuhashi, Atsushi Shibata, Yoshiyuki Uchida, Kiyofumi Matsuda, Chander P. Grover
2004· article· en· Optics Communications· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About