MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
arXiv (Cornell University)
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

12,857 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
12,857 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 55 of 258

Labels cover 18 of 12,857 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 12,857 of 12,857 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

aboutno affgemma · no categorygpt · no categorymodels agree
Determination and correction of persistent biases in quantum annealers
Alejandro Perdomo‐Ortiz, Bryan O’Gorman, Joseph Fluegemann, Rupak Biswas, Vadim Smelyanskiy
2015· preprint· en· arXiv (Cornell University)· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affunlabeled
DeepFlux for Skeletons in the Wild
Yukang Wang, Yongchao Xu, Stavros Tsogkas, Xiang Bai, Sven Dickinson, Kaleem Siddiqi
2018· preprint· en· arXiv (Cornell University)· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
afffundunlabeled
Particle Creation by Loop Black Holes
Emanuele Alesci, Leonardo Modesto
2011· preprint· en· arXiv (Cornell University)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
fundno affunlabeled
The Classification of Fusion 2-Categories
Thibault D. Décoppet, Peter Huston, Theo Johnson-Freyd, Dmitri Nikshych, David Penneys, Julia Plavnik +2 more
2024· preprint· en· arXiv (Cornell University)· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
fundno affunlabeled
On the Status of Quantum State Realism
Wayne C. Myrvold
2019· preprint· en· arXiv (Cornell University)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affunlabeled
Estimating Open Access Mandate Effectiveness: The MELIBEA Score
Philippe Vincent‐Lamarre, Jade Boivin, Yassine Gargouri, Vincent Larivière, Stevan Harnad
2014· preprint· en· arXiv (Cornell University)· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+bibliometrics+open_scienceconsensus · none
3
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About