MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Cryospheric studies and observations
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

4,944 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
4,944 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 56 of 99

Labels cover 4 of 4,944 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 4,944 of 4,944 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

venueaboutno affunlabeled
A call to physical geographers
Ian Saunders, Roger Hayter
2008· article· en· Canadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennes· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affunlabeled
GABLS4 intercomparison of snow models at Dome C in Antarctica
Patrick Le Moigne, Éric Bazile, Anning Cheng, Emanuel Dutra, John Edwards, William Maurel +5 more
2022· article· en· ˜The œcryosphere· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
afffundunlabeled
The glacial systems model (GSM) Version 25G
Lev Tarasov, Benoit S. Lecavalier, Kevin Hank, David F. Pollard
2025· article· en· Geoscientific model development· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
A Stochastic Model of Iceberg Drift Including Wave Effect
Marc Pavec, Edmond Coche
2007· article· en· Proceedings of the International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering Under Arctic Conditions· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Average Maximum Snow Depth
2010· report· en· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Erratum
2019· erratum· en· Polar Research· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About