MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

3,873 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20012025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
3,873 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 65 of 78

Labels cover 1 of 3,873 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 3,873 of 3,873 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
X-Shooting ULLYSES: Massive stars at low metallicity
S. A. Brands, F. Backs, Alex de Koter, J. Puls, P. A. Crowther, H. Sana +18 more
2025· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
afffundunlabeled
PDRs4All
Dries Van De Putte, E. Peeters, Karl D. Gordon, J. D. Smith, Thomas S. -Y. Lai, Alexandros Maragkoudakis +10 more
2025· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
affunlabeled
The XXL Survey
2018· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
afffundunlabeled
Alcock–Paczyński effect on void-finding
Slađana Radinović, Hans A. Winther, S. Nadathur, Will J. Percival, E. Paillas, Tristan Sohrab Fraser +2 more
2024· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
affunlabeled
The VIMOS Public Extragalactic Redshift Survey (VIPERS)
A. Marchetti, B. Garilli, B. R. Granett, L. Guzzo, A. Iovino, M. Scodeggio +31 more
2017· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
affunlabeled
The redshift evolution of galactic bar pattern speed in TNG50
Asiyeh Habibi, Mahmood Roshan, Mohammad Hosseinirad, Habib G. Khosroshahi, J. A. L. Aguerri, Virginia Cuomo +1 more
2024· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
affunlabeled
New KiDS in town
M. Gatto, M. Bellazzini, C. Tortora, V. Ripepi, M. Dall’Ora, M. Cignoni +6 more
2024· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
5
citations
fundno affunlabeled
The present-day cosmic phosphorus abundance
P. Aschenbrenner, Kate Butler, N. Przybilla
2025· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
afffundaboutunlabeled
Catalogue of BRITE-Constellation targets
K. Zwintz, A. Pigulski, R. Kuschnig, G. A. Wade, G. Mark Doherty, M. Earl +22 more
2023· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
fundno affunlabeled
The XXL Survey
2016· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
affunlabeled
Upper limits to the water abundance in starburst galaxies
C. D. Wilson, R. S. Booth, A. O. H. Olofsson, M. Olberg, C. M. Persson, Aa. Sandqvist +8 more
2007· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
affunlabeled
<i>Planck</i> intermediate results
P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, M. I. R. Alves, M. Arnaud, F. Atrio‐Barandela, J. Aumont +177 more
2018· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
AGB stars as tracers of metallicity and mean age across M 33
M.-R. L. Cioni, M. Irwin, A. M. N. Ferguson, Alan W. McConnachie, Blair C. Conn, Avon Huxor +3 more
2009· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
fundno affunlabeled
J-PLUS: Detecting and studying extragalactic globular clusters
Danielle de Brito Silva, P. Coelho, A. Cortesi, Gustavo Bruzual, G. Magris, Ana L. Chies-Santos +16 more
2022· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About