MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
American Constitutional Law and Politics
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

3,460 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
3,460 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 8 of 70

Labels cover 6 of 3,460 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 3,460 of 3,460 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affaboutunlabeled
JUDGING RELIGION AND JUDGES' RELIGIONS
Howard Kislowicz
2018· article· en· Journal of Law and Religion· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Coming Home
Philip Jenkins
2002· book-chapter· en· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
5
citations
affunlabeled
Religions and Trade
Peter Wick, Volker Rabens
2013· book· en· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Milton in America
Paul Stevens
2008· article· en· University of Toronto Quarterly· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
affunlabeled
The Secular Theater
Anthony B. Dawson
2009· book-chapter· en· Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
affunlabeled
Constitutional Government
Lee Ward
2010· book-chapter· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
affunlabeled
Concealing for Freedom
Francesca Musiani, Ksenia Ermoshina
2022· book· en· Mattering Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
venueno affunlabeled
COVENANTS FOR THE SWORD
Alice Ristroph
2011· article· en· University of Toronto Law Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Prayers, Petitions, and Protests
Jack D. Cécillon
2013· book· en· McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affvenueno abstractunlabeled
Official Apologies
Rhoda E. Howard-Hassmann
2013· article· en· Transitional justice review· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About