MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

474 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
474 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 8 of 10

Labels cover 1 of 474 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 474 of 474 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

fundno affunlabeled
Time, verbs, and imagining events.
Jeffrey Hong, Todd R. Ferretti, Rachel A. Craven, Rachelle D Hepburn
2019· article· en· Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Sex differences in curve tracing.
Daniel Voyer, Benjamin R. MacPherson
2020· article· en· Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
afffundunlabeled
Distinctiveness and repetition in item recognition.
Murray Singer, Anjum Fazaluddin, Kathy N. Andrew
2011· article· en· Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
afffundaboutunlabeled
Recollections of an accidental contrarian.
Doreen Kimura
2006· article· fr· Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affunlabeled
Registered Reports.
Randall K. Jamieson, Glen E. Bodner, Jean Saint‐Aubin, Debra Titone
2019· article· en· Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale· Nursing
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+open_science+insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
2
citations
afffundunlabeled
Constituent processing in compound and pseudocompound words.
Taylor Melvie, Alexander Taikh, Christina L. Gagné, Thomas L. Spalding
2022· article· en· Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
afffundaboutunlabeled
Comparative cognition and cognitive ecology in the classroom.
Steven J. Lamontagne, Valerie A. Kuhlmeier, Mary C. Olmstead
2020· article· en· Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
afffundunlabeled
The effect of instructions and response format on smile judgement.
Annie Roy‐Charland, Victoria Foglia, Emalie Hendel, Marie-Pier Mazerolle
2023· article· en· Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
2020–2021 Reviewers—Consultants 2020–2021
2021· article· fr· Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
afffundunlabeled
Chronométrage et perception temporelle.
Simon Grondin
2017· review· fr· Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Stimulus-based mirror effects in associative recognition revisited.
Molly B. MacMillan, Tyler M. Ensor, Aimée M. Surprenant, Ian Neath
2022· article· en· Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About