MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
University of Toronto Law Journal
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

571 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
571 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 8 of 12

Labels cover 0 of 571 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 571 of 571 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

venueno affunlabeled
How tort law empowers
Ori J. Herstein
2014· article· en· University of Toronto Law Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affvenueaboutunlabeled
CONSTITUTIONALIZING SELF-DEFENCE
Alan Brudner
2011· article· en· University of Toronto Law Journal· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueaboutno affunlabeled
ERNIE'S THREE WORLDS
Bruce Chapman
2011· article· en· University of Toronto Law Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affvenueunlabeled
The office of ownership revisited
Christopher Essert
2020· article· en· University of Toronto Law Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affvenueunlabeled
TREBILCOCK ON TAX AVOIDANCE
Benjamin Alarie
2010· article· en· University of Toronto Law Journal· Business, Management and Accounting
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affvenueaboutunlabeled
THE CONSTITUTION AS FRAMEWORK FOR GOVERNANCE
Vanessa MacDonnell
2013· article· en· University of Toronto Law Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Two logics of authority in modern law
Arie Rosen
2014· article· en· University of Toronto Law Journal· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Office-holding and officiality
Nicole Roughan
2020· article· en· University of Toronto Law Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affunlabeled
When judges are not judging
Julius Yam
2025· article· en· University of Toronto Law Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affunlabeled
When, and how, does property matter?
Avihay Dorfman
2021· article· en· University of Toronto Law Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affunlabeled
FORMALISM IN MUSIC AND LAW
Allan Beever
2011· article· en· University of Toronto Law Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueaboutno affunlabeled
INTRODUCTION
Isabel Grant, Martha Shaffer, Alison Symington
2013· article· en· University of Toronto Law Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
1
citations
venueaboutno affunlabeled
THE LAW OF CAPTURE, NEWFOUNDLAND-STYLE
Bruce Ziff
2013· article· en· University of Toronto Law Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affunlabeled
The Legitimacy of Civil Freedom
Florian Rödl
2018· article· en· University of Toronto Law Journal· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Editors' Note
2007· article· en· University of Toronto Law Journal
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affvenueunlabeled
Taking tort seriously
Stephen A. Smith
2020· article· en· University of Toronto Law Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affunlabeled
The right to have private rights
Ralf Michaels
2024· article· en· University of Toronto Law Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About