MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Climate change and permafrost
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

5,389 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
5,389 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 99 of 108

Labels cover 8 of 5,389 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 5,389 of 5,389 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Climate change in the Arctic
Paul Treitz
2024· article· en· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
fundaboutno affunlabeled
Reply on RC1
Victoria Dutch
2023· peer-review· en· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundaboutunlabeled
Comment on egusphere-2023-772
2023· peer-review· en· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundunlabeled
Comment on tc-2022-5
2022· peer-review· en· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundunlabeled
Reply on RC1
Tyler Herrington
2022· peer-review· en· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Comment on essd-2022-61
2022· peer-review· en· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundaboutunlabeled
Comment on bg-2021-150
Sarah Shakil, Suzanne E. Tank, Jorien E. Vonk, Scott Zolkos
2021· peer-review· en· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Comment on tc-2023-20
2023· peer-review· en· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundaboutunlabeled
Comment on tc-2022-149
Jurjen van der Sluijs, Steven V. Kokelj, Jon Tunnicliffe
2022· peer-review· en· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Reply on RC1
Moritz Langer
2023· peer-review· en· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Reply on RC1
Brian Groenke
2023· peer-review· en· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundaboutunlabeled
Reply on RC1
Evan J. Wilcox
2023· peer-review· en· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundunlabeled
Comment on egusphere-2023-571
2023· peer-review· en· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundaboutunlabeled
Reply on RC2
Jurjen van der Sluijs
2023· peer-review· en· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundaboutunlabeled
Reply on RC1
Jurjen van der Sluijs
2023· peer-review· en· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Reply on RC2
Moritz Langer
2023· peer-review· en· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Reply on RC2
Brian Groenke
2023· peer-review· en· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Reply on RC1
Georgina Woolley
2024· peer-review· en· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Comment on egusphere-2022-473
2023· peer-review· en· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundaboutunlabeled
Reply on RC3
Evan J. Wilcox
2023· peer-review· en· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Reply on RC1
Tino Peplau
2023· peer-review· en· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About