MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Publishing and Scholarly Communication
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

827 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
827 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 17

Labels cover 14 of 827 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 827 of 827 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Open Journal Systems
John Willinsky
2005· article· en· Library Hi Tech· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
100
citations
venueno affunlabeled
The University of Minnesota Press
Pam Werre
2009· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
70
citations
affunlabeled
Beyond traditional publishing models
Jen Pecoskie, Heather Hill
2015· article· en· Journal of Documentation· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
50
citations
affunlabeled
SOCIAL TAGGING AND THE NEXT STEPS FOR INDEXING
Joseph T. Tennis
2006· article· en· Advances in Classification Research Online· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
34
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
The self-publishing phenomenon and libraries
Juris Dilevko, Keren Dali
2006· article· en· Library & Information Science Research· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
30
citations
affunlabeled
Eats, Shoots & Leaves
Barry Pless
2005· article· en· Injury Prevention· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
28
citations
affunlabeled
Enlisting the power of the verb
Lorelei Lingard
2015· article· en· Perspectives on Medical Education· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
23
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Literary Encyclopedia
Brian Vetruba
2012· article· en· The Charleston Advisor· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communication+insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
21
citations
venueno affunlabeled
A System Destabilized: Scholarly Books Today
Margaret Dalton
2006· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
21
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
On Book Reviewing
Evelina Orteza y Miranda
2018· article· en· Journal of educational thought.· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communication+insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
18
citations
affvenueaboutunlabeled
Open Access Funds: A Canadian Library Survey
Leila Fernandez, Rajiv Nariani
2011· article· en· Partnership The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communication+open_scienceconsensus · none
17
citations
venueno affunlabeled
A System Destabilized: Scholarly Books Today
Margaret Dalton
2006· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
16
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
The novel: a biography
2014· article· en· Choice Reviews Online· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
14
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
The Futures of Scholarly Publishing
Cathy N. Davidson
2004· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
11
citations
venueno affunlabeled
The Price of University Press Books, 2012–14
Albert N. Greco, Alana M. Spendley
2016· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
10
citations
venueno affgemma · scholarly_communication+research_integritygpt · scholarly_communication+research_integritymodels split
Plagiarism, Publishing, and the Academy
Dan Harms
2006· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communication+research_integrityconsensus · none
10
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Peer Review: Fetishes, Fallacies, and Perceptions
Robin Derricourt
2011· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
9
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About