MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library)
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

448 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002024
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
448 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 9

Labels cover 0 of 448 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 448 of 448 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

aboutno affunlabeled
A Question of Autonomy?
John F. Seymour
2000· book· en· DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
22
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
The Way Women Perceive Teratogenic Risk
2007· article· en· DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library)· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
21
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Ethics for the Practice of Psychology in Canada
2004· other· en· DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
9
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
A Spoonful of Trust Helps the Nanotech Go Down
Bryn Williams–Jones
2004· article· en· DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library)· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
9
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Animals and Science: A Guide to the Debates
Niall Shanks
2002· book· en· DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library)· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Cross-cultural biotechnology
Michael C. Brannigan
2004· book· en· DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library)· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Biomedical Ethics: A Canadian Focus
2009· other· en· DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Research Ethics Boards and Challenges for Public Participation
Denise Avard, Michèle Stanton-Jean, Roberta L. Woodgate, Daryl Pullman, Raphael Saginur
2009· article· en· DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library)· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · none
3
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Ethics Review of Multi-Centre Trials: Where Do We Stand?
Raphael Saginur, P. Deschamps, Michael Owen, Heather Sampson
2009· article· en· DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library)· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · metaresearch
3
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About