MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Journalism Practice
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

28 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20072025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
28 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 1

Labels cover 1 of 28 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 28 of 28 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

fundno affunlabeled
THE JOURNALISTIC GUT FEELING
Ida Schultz
2007· article· en· Journalism Practice· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
465
citations
fundno affunlabeled
“They Go for Gender First”
Catherine Adams
2017· article· en· Journalism Practice· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
104
citations
affunlabeled
The Validity of Global Press Ratings
J. David Martin, Dalia Abbas, Ralph J. Martins
2015· article· en· Journalism Practice· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
33
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
HELP OR HARM?
Linda Kay, Rosemary C. Reilly, Kate Connolly, Stephen L. Cohen
2010· article· en· Journalism Practice· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
27
citations
affunlabeled
News Organizations 2.0
Ahmed Al‐Rawi
2016· article· en· Journalism Practice· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
20
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
OBITUARIES FOR SALE
Nigel Starck
2008· article· en· Journalism Practice· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
7
citations
fundaboutno affunlabeled
The Work of Sexual Violence Reporting
Nelanthi Hewa
2025· article· en· Journalism Practice· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About