MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Reviews in Mathematical Physics
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

47 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
47 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 1

Labels cover 0 of 47 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 47 of 47 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
CORRUGATED SURFACES AND A.C. SPECTRUM
Vojkan Jakšić, Yoram Last
2000· review· en· Reviews in Mathematical Physics· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
27
citations
afffundunlabeled
Entanglement in fermionic chains and bispectrality
Nicolas Crampé, Rafael I. Nepomechie, Luc Vinet
2021· review· en· Reviews in Mathematical Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
18
citations
affunlabeled
ON SPECTRAL RENORMALIZATION GROUP
2009· article· en· Reviews in Mathematical Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
15
citations
afffundunlabeled
Light cones for open quantum systems in the continuum
Sébastien Breteaux, Jérémy Faupin, Marius Lemm, Dong Hao Ou Yang, Israel Michael Sigal, Jingxuan Zhang
2024· review· en· Reviews in Mathematical Physics· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
8
citations
affunlabeled
QUANTIZATION OF SINGULAR REDUCTION
L. Bates, Richard Cushman, Mark Hamilton, Jędrzej Śniatycki
2009· review· en· Reviews in Mathematical Physics· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
afffundunlabeled
On the absence of stationary currents
2020· article· en· Reviews in Mathematical Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affunlabeled
On Tsirelson pairs of C*-algebras
Isaac Goldbring, Bradd Hart
2023· review· en· Reviews in Mathematical Physics· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Reviews in Mathematical Physics: Editorial
Detlev Buchholz, Masaki Izumi, Taku Matsui
2002· review· en· Reviews in Mathematical Physics· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Vortices and factorization
Igor Loutsenko, Oksana Yermolayeva
2025· review· en· Reviews in Mathematical Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About