MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Educational and Psychological Assessments
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

911 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
911 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 10 of 19

Labels cover 2 of 911 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 911 of 911 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Measuring change
David L. Streiner, Geoffrey R. Norman, John Cairney
2014· book· en· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Elevers hjemmesprog: Ven eller fjende?
Patricia Chow, Zarina Khan, Padma Sastri, Alison Shirashi, Lisa Leoni, Sarah Cohen +1 more
2008· article· da· Sprogforum Tidsskrift for sprog- og kulturpædagogik· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Une adaptation des Nurture Groups au Québec:
Caroline Couture, Jean-Yves Bégin
2010· book-chapter· fr· Presses de l'Université du Québec eBooks· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Montreal Cognitive Assessment--Thai Version
Solaphat Hemrungrojn, Sookjaroen Tangwongchai, Thammanard Charernboon, Muthita Phanasathit, Thitiporn Supasitthumrong, Pisit Chaipresertsud +4 more
2021· dataset· en· PsycTESTS Dataset· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Peer response and second language writers
Eileen Joan Tithecott
2009· article· en· cIRcle (University of British Columbia)· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Vernon, Philip E
Naji Abi‐Hashem
2013· other· en· The Encyclopedia of Cross‐Cultural Psychology· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About