MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,307 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,307 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 15 of 27

Labels cover 2 of 1,307 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,307 of 1,307 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
The Algonquian Inverse
Will Oxford
2023· book· en· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Choice and balance in Michif negation
H. Christoph Wolfart
2010· article· en· The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La revue canadienne de linguistique· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Appendix: question types questionnaire
Cédric Patin, Kristina Riedel
2011· article· en· ZAS Papers in Linguistics· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
1
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Aspect-tense relations in East Greenlandic
Philippe Mennecier
2016· book-chapter· en· Studies in language companion series· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Focus on head-final relatives
Karsten Koch
2013· article· en· The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La revue canadienne de linguistique· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Data for LakeM2ARS Simulations
2025· dataset· en· Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Case Interactions in Syntax
Jessica Coon, Clint Parker
2019· reference-entry· en· Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affvenueunlabeled
Une anaphore nue en malgache
Ileana Paul
2004· article· fr· Revue québécoise de linguistique· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
The rise of featural modality in English
Elizabeth Cowper
2012· article· en· Papers from the Annual Meetings of the Atlantic Provinces Linguistic Association (PAMAPLA)· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Regularities in irregular Chaha verbs
Degif Petros Banksira
2014· book-chapter· en· Language faculty and beyond· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Dependency in Language
Igor Mel’čuk
2014· book-chapter· en· Linguistik aktuell· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Countability in Mbyá
Guillaume Thomas
2020· article· en· Linguistic Variation· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
‘Bad’ Grammar and the Language Faculty
J. K. Chambers
2010· article· en· Scholarly Commons (University of Pennsylvania)· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Negative concord in Quebec French
Marie Labelle
2017· article· en· Probus· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
afffundunlabeled
Correlates of Object Raising in Mayan
Justin Royer, Jessica Coon
2025· article· en· Language and Linguistics Compass· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Introduction: Interface Asymmetries
Anna Maria Di Sciullo
2008· article· en· The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La revue canadienne de linguistique· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
The Support Role of Auxiliaries
Walter Hirtle, Fonds Gustave Guillaume
2013· article· en· The Journal of Macrodynamic Analysis (Memorial University of Newfoundland)· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Given two be’s, how do they Agree?
Diane Massam, Erin Grant
2014· article· en· The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La revue canadienne de linguistique· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
The grammaticalization of ‘big’ situations
Marı́a Luisa Rivero, Ana Arregui, Nikolay Slavkov
2017· book-chapter· en· Linguistik aktuell· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About