MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Museums and Cultural Heritage
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,550 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,550 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 16 of 31

Labels cover 2 of 1,550 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,550 of 1,550 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Exhibition Review
K. Hart
2018· article· en· Public· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Review <i>The Visiting Curators</i>
Léuli Eshrāghi, Sarah Biscarra Dilley, T. S. Hogue, Lana Lopesi, Freja Carmichael
2023· article· en· Australian and New Zealand Journal of Art· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Critical Museology
Anthony Shelton
2018· other· en· The Encyclopedia of Archaeological Sciences· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Conserver et douter
2023· article· it· Università degli Studi di Verona· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Front Matter
2018· paratext· en· Presses de l'Université du Québec eBooks· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
affvenueaboutunlabeled
A Living History Museum
Yvonne Wang
2025· article· en· The iJournal Student Journal of the Faculty of Information· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
References
2017· book-chapter· en· Policy Press eBooks· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affvenueaboutunlabeled
Experiential Learning as Archival Activation
David S. Jones, Lelland Reed, Laura Reid, Shea Iles
2025· article· en· CAML Review / Revue de l ACBM· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Dans le miroir du temps
Dominique Séréna-Allier, Sylvie Sagnes
2009· article· fr· Les Nouvelles de l archéologie· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
fundno affunlabeled
What do you really want?
Boris Kavur, Martina Blečić Kavur
2022· article· sl· Studia universitatis hereditati znanstvena revija za raziskave in teorijo kulturne dediščine· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Museums Other than Art
2014· book-chapter· en· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About