MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,130 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,130 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 18 of 43

Labels cover 1 of 2,130 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,130 of 2,130 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affaboutunlabeled
The Courts
Ran Hirschl
2007· article· en· Canadian Journal of Political Science· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Enforcing Laws That Infringe Rights
Robert Leckey
2015· article· en· SSRN Electronic Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Niqabs in Canadian Courts:<i>R v NS</i>
M. H. Ogilvie
2013· article· en· Ecclesiastical Law Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
The constitution and the future of Canada.
Curtis Haberfeld
2016· article· en· Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Rights Talk and Constitutional Emotivism
Alexander Loehndorf
2023· article· en· Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueaboutno affunlabeled
Charter Checks and Parliamentary Balances
Baker Dennis, Rainer Knopff
2011· article· en· Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
The Law and Judiciary
Gary Teeple
2024· book-chapter· en· Marx, Engels, and Marxisms· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Reality Check: On the Uses of Empiricism
Peter Carver
2008· article· en· Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Federal Judicial Tenure
Albert Yoon
2017· book· en· Oxford University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Introduction
Goldsworthy Jeffrey
2007· book· en· Oxford University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
1
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Access to <i>Charter</i> Justice
Carissima Mathen
2017· book-chapter· en· Oxford University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Courts and Issue Attention in Canada
Nicholas D. Conway, Soren Jordan, Joseph Daniel Ura
2018· article· en· Social Science Quarterly· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Appointments to the Supreme Court of Canada
Peter J. McCormick
2018· book-chapter· en· Oxford University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About